A simple analysis of the Tucker Carlson-Vladimir Putin interview that occurred a few days ago.
I am only street-smart.
I've never professed to be anything else.
But these street smarts have taken me to the highest echelons of finance and fame without selling my soul, leaving me pitted in a mortal battle against The Matrix for my very life and freedom.
I analyze the speech with no "expertise" besides my understanding of how simple the world can be when you rule out the impossibilities and are left with the few options that could be possible.
Unmatched perspicacity.
Many people are going to praise the interview regardless of what was said because Putin is respected and idolized for his nationalism and track record of competency.
These are the exact two qualities the common man is calling out for and never seems to find in Western "leadership".
Many are going to consider the interview a fumbled chance to deal a death blow to the USA in the midst of a culture war.
Tucker gave him many chances to nail the West hard for failing its people.
Why not mention election fraud?
Why give a lesson on Russian history the average Westerner has little interest in?
Why not mention the LGBT agenda destroying the family?
Why so softly state the US Dollar is failing when he could have highlighted it far more poignantly?
My thought patterns are simple.
Putin's track record displays brutal competency.
"You will know them by their fruits" - Matthew 7:15-20
A man who produces results IS competent.
The idea that he "missed a chance" or "made a mistake" is brutal arrogance from a layperson.
We do not possess a fraction of the understanding of geopolitical power structures and interconnectedness that Putin does.
His track record displays absolute effectiveness, so I doubt he forgot to mention many of the things he has often mentioned to Russian state media.
He DOES say these things when speaking to Russians but he did NOT say them when speaking to the West.
He DECIDED not to.
The question is why?
WHY would Putin not want to accelerate the decimation of faith in Western institutions by its constituents?
We should all accept the following statement to be true:
He knows things we do not know.
Coupled with the track record, we can state as a matter of fact that:
Putin is competent and knows things we do not know.
Overall, I would describe his attitude as altruistic.
He didn't care very much.
He sees the global mess as America's problem to fix.
Not his.
He could have said things that would have accelerated the ending of the war in Ukraine by galvanizing public support against it.
He did not say those things.
Why?
Does he want this war?
I don't know.
Are intelligence agencies already in touch?
Has a deal been done?
Is he avoiding rocking the boat because he has favorable agreements from "the other side"?
I don't know.
I repeat.
Putin is competent and knows things we do not know.
He did highlight evidently that America will fall anyway, with or without the Ukraine war.
He seems confident America will fall with or without the insanity purported by the Western elite simply because of a refusal to understand a changing global landscape and population dynamics, along with the weaponization of the dollar.
I think many expected a death blow to the US establishment and a highlight of the culture war and considering his competence, knowledge and experience, the most likely scenario that this didn't happen is simple...
Galvanizing the American public to get their act together isn't good for Russia.
America and the collective West are already acting exactly how he would want them to act.
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte
No comments:
Post a Comment